
On April 3 2008, John Galt, Panavision Senior Vice President, Advanced Digital Imaging, and Larry Thorpe, National Marketing Manager, Canon Broadcast & Communication Division, presented their views on a realistic, scientifically valid way to gauge the quality of recorded pictures that belies the theory that “it’s all about the pixels.” The sessions were held at Panavision’s world headquarters in Woodland Hills, and taped in high definition video with three cameras before a live audience of cinematographers, and other craftsmen, studio executives and the media.
What did we learn?
The key issue, especially for those of us dealing with customers at Panavision, is that the pixel output of a camera system has little to do with final image performance. Production staffs who judge camera performance purely on pixel counts may be short-changing themselves on the actual quality of the images that are finally seen on big and little screens.
An important question to ask is how many photo sites does the imager (or sensor) have that contribute to the output? A so-called “4K camera” that has an imager with only 8 or 10 million photo sites but outputs 25 or 32 megapixels is interpolating data without adding any image performance. Moreover, it creates a four-fold increase in post-production digital data to be stored and processed that is both unnecessary and expensive.
Marketing pixels come at a price!
By contrast, Genesis has a 12.4 million photo site sensor, produces content superior to what is commonly called a “4K” camera, but through “super-sampling” our final output which is only 6 megapixels (or an 8 megabyte DPX frame). In other words: Same or better picture quality with far less overhead.
Instead of using pixels to determine picture quality, Galt and Thorpe recommend the MTF (Modulation Transfer Function) System—a resolution system that takes into account multiple factors in the actual production of any given image such as measurable characteristics of lenses, the sensor used in actual recording, intermediate film stocks, even the projector lens—digital movie makers have tools to help them gauge precisely what effect each step has on the production of that final image.
Once movie makers understands how variables such as MTF, Nyquest calculations, Beyer pattern, the scientific difference between sharpness and resolution have real impact on digital pictures—all explored in this symposium by Galt and Thorpe--they will be better equipped to choose the right cameras and associated technologies to produce the pictures they want.
“Demystifying Digital Camera Specifications” is a meaningful way to understand clearly where each part of the movie-making process plays its part.
Part 1 discusses the following topics:
A short history of CCD/CMOS development, Sub-sampling and Super-sampling, HD lens and camera design strategies, Photosites - the tradeoff between resolution, dynamic range, and noise, Digital output signals from cameras, UHDTV, 2K and 4K cameras, and DCI Standards for 2K and 4K.
Part 2 discusses the following topics:
The Nyquist Theorem, linking optical and digital sampling, The implications of Fill factor and optical low pass filtering, The Nyquist boundaries of of motion pictures, and Limiting resolution.
Part 3 discusses the following topics:
Introduction to MTF, Introduction to an individual element’s contribution to final MTF, Transferring contrast, Cascading MTFs, Introduction to Otto Schade, Perceived picture sharpness and MTF, Edge Sharpness, image textures, and resolving power.
Part 4 discusses the following topics:
Pixels are not resolution, Practical measurements of MTF, Introduction to sinusoidal MTF charts, The Panavision sinusoidal MTF Chart, MTF benches for measuring lenses, Cascaded MTF of a DI, Sensor MTF response, Depth of Field, MTF measurements of real world lenses.
Part 5 discusses the following topics:
Line pairs per Millimeter, Differences between HDTV and SDTV lens standards, a demonstration of the MTF-Aliasing dilemma using three chip cameras, Loading the imager MTF into the digital container.
Part 6 discusses the following topics:
The resolution metric for a Bayer pattern sensor, Diagonal sampling Bayer pattern sensors, Optical lowpass filter options for single Bayer pattern sensors.
Part 7 discusses the following topics:
Spectral response, Camera color balance: Daylight v. Tungsten, Digital Intermediate MTF comparison between Genesis and 5218, Bayer vs. RGB striped sensors.
Additional Information
| |
| |
|
| A Pixel is Not a Little Square, A Pixel is Not a Little Square, A Pixel is Not a Little Square! |
|
Alvy Ray Smith |
|
Microsoft |
|
July 17, 1995 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Harry Nyquist |
|
wikipedia.org |
| |
|
|
Nyquist-Shannon Sampling Theorem |
|
wikipedia.org |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
4K+ Systems: Theory Basis for Motion Picture Imaging |
|
Dr Hans Kiening |
|
ARRI R&D |
|
2008 |
| |
|
|
Image Quality: A Comparison of Photographic and Television Systems |
|
Otto H. Schade, Sr. |
|
Reprinted SMPTE Journal, 100: 567 - 595 |
|
June 1987 |
| |
|
|
Relationships Between Pixel Count, Aliasing and Limiting Resolution in Digital Motion Picture systems |
|
Roger Morton, Christopher DuMont and Michelle Maurer |
|
SMPTE Journal, Vol 112 |
|
July / August 2003 |
| |
|
|
The Sharpness Indicator |
|
Ivan Putora |
|
SMPTE Journal, Vol 107 |
|
February 1998 |
| |
|
|
A New Digital HD Cine Zoom Lens for Digital Motion Pictures |
|
Laurence Thorpe, Ken Ito, Fumiaki Usui, Jun Hosoya |
|
SMPTE Journal Vol 114 |
|
October / November 2005 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Modular Transfer Function in Optical and Electro-Optical Systems |
|
Glenn D. Boreman |
|
SPIIE (The International Society of Optical Engineering) Press |
|
2001 |
| |
|
|
How to Measure MTF and Other Properties of Lenses |
|
Optikos Corporation |
|
Cambridge, MA |
|
July 199 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
The HD Camcorder and the March to Marketplace Camera |
|
Laurence Thorpe, Fumio Nagumo and Kazuo Ike |
|
SMPTE Journal, Vol 107 |
|
March 1998 |
| |
|
|
Contemporary DTV Acquisition- Some Perspectives on the Related Standards, the Technology and the Creative |
|
Laurence Thorpe |
|
SMPTE Journal, Vol 108 |
|
August 1999 |
| |
|
|
Technical Aspects of the New World of Multiformat DTV Embodying Progressive, Interlaced and Segmented Frame Video Formats |
|
Laurence Thorpe |
|
SMPTE Journal, Vol 109 |
|
September 2000 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
The Effect of Single-Sensor CFA Captures on Images Intended for Motion Picture and TV Applications |
|
Richard B. Wheeler and Nestor M. Rodriguez |
|
Eastman Kodak Company |
|
SMPTE Journal |
|
October 2007 |
| |
|
|
A 1920 x 1080 @ 60P System Compatible with a 1920 x 1080 30i Format |
|
William Glenn, John Marcinka and Robert Dhein |
|
Florida Atlantic University |
|
SMPTE 36th Advanced Motion Imaging Conference |
|
Dallas, TX |
|
February 7 - 9, 2002 |
| |
|
|
The Geometrical Modulation Transfer Function (MTF)- For Different Pixel Active Area Shapes |
|
Orly Yadid-Pecht |
|
Electrical and Computer Engineering Dept |
|
Ben Gurion University of the Negev |
|
Israel |
| |
|
|
Image Resolution of the One-CCD Palomar Motion Picture Camera |
|
Charles Smith, Felicia Shu and Lucian Ion |
|
DALSA Digital Cinema Business Unit |
|
SMPTE 37th Advanced Motion Imaging Conference |
|
Seattle, WA |
|
February 27 - March 1, 2003 |
| |
|
|
Bayer- US Patent #3,971,065 |
|
Bryce E. Bayer |
|
Eastman Kodak Company |
|
Rochester, New York |
|
May 5, 2008 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Genesis: The First Complete 35mm Digital Cinematography System |
|
John Galt, Kazuyoshi Kiga, Hiroshi Kiriyama, Yasuhiko Mikami |
|
Panavision and Sony |
|
October 20 - 23, 2004 |
| |
|
|
Chroma Subsampling |
|
wikipedia.org |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|